|
    Home > Developing Mathematics for Modeling > Measurement |
 |
 |
   Measurement |
|
    What
is Measure? |
    Goal |
 |
Before
beginning instruction,
we aim to assess
students' prior
knowledge about
conceptions of
nature of units
(iteration, identity,
tiling for length
etc.), about scale-origin
(zero-point),
about the role
and nature of
tools employed.
Students' written
work and classroom
conversation provide
benchmark assessment.
|
 |
    Related
Principles & Big
Ideas |
 |
|
 |
    Activity
Structure |
 |
Small Group Work, Presentation of questions on overhead
transparency or on large sheets of paper posted on the
wall. (The second option allows for ready comparison.)
Question clusters considered by small groups, presented
one cluster at a time.
I.
1. What does it mean to measure something?
2. Give 3 really different examples of things
you can measure. Why are they different?
II.
1. How do you measure how long something is? What are some important
things to keep in mind?
2. How do you measure how heavy something is? What are
some important things to keep in mind?
3. How do you measure how fast something is changing
(like when something is growing or when we are traveling
in a car)? What are some important things to keep in
mind?
4. How would you measure how much space is in this room?
III. How do tools help? Give 3 examples.
|
 |
    Teacher
Support of Student
Thinking |
 |
Using
student responses
as the starting
point, elicit
and elaborate
the following
big ideas:
- Relation
between attribute
being measured
and the unit
of measure
(e.g., students
often think
that everything
should be
measured by
the same unit
or believe
that only
conventional
measures are “real” measures.)
Do students
recognize
that some
other attribute,
like time,
can be used
as a measure
of a given
attribute
(like length).
For example,
we often say
the distance
between two
cities is “about
an hour.” Just
how diverse
are student
examples?
- Thinking
of objects
as having
multiple attributes
and therefore
potentially
multiple forms
of measurement.
For example,
a glass has
attributes
of height,
a length,
of weight,
and volume.
Each object
has potentially
many attributes
that could
be conceived
and therefore,
measured.
- By
asking students
to actually
measure,
one might
prompt discussion
about Iteration,
Identical
units, tiling
(in cases
of spatial
measure).
See Assessing
Thinking.
|
 |
   Assessing
Thinking |
 |
Although
the entire lesson
is intended as
an assessment
of the collective,
teachers have
elaborated on
the lesson to
get a better fix
on student reasoning.
Here we note some
of the tasks and
situations they
developed to assess
student reasoning
and to support
its development.
- ENACTMENT OF MEASUREMENT.
Some teachers have found that asking students to measure something,
such as the length of a line on the board, with a variety of
tools including, but not only, rulers, is a good context
for seeing what students attend to. Classroom conversations
about different approaches or strategies are helpful for
hearing how students talk about linear measure. Other approaches
have included asking one student to measure the length from
fingertip to fingertip of the outstretched arms of another
students with a plastic water bottle. Many students think
this is not possible, others begin measuring with the bottle
in unexpected ways.
- OBJECT-ATTRIBUTE DISTINCTION.
Some
teachers have brought
in a pile of dirt
and asked students
to list different
qualities of that
dirt that could
be measured. Students
have mentioned
things like height,
amount, weight,
texture, and color.
Other teachers
have asked students
if speed and distance
are any different,
and if so, how?
(In one 6 th grade
class, a student
proposed that the
difference was
that speed involved "moving
distances" and
gave an example
of a distance
being moved during
a longer and shorter
interval of time).
- HOME-SCHOOL CONNECTIONS.
Some teachers have found it helpful to ask students to list measurements
they have seen or done outside of school. In school, they associate
measurement with rulers. Outside of school, they seem to be more
willing to consider other tools (like measuring cups and spring scales)
and attributes other than length.
|
 |
    Students'
Ways of Thinking |
 |
When
teachers have
tried this lesson,
students often
display patterns
of thinking. We
summarize some
of the most salient
patterns here: Â Â Â Â
<Students'
ways of thinking
about measurement>
When
students are
asked
what it
means to
measure
something,
students
often think
primarily
of one attribute
for every object.
We hope that
they come to
think
of an object
as a bundle
of
potential attributes.
For example,
many
students think
that “measure” means
to measure
length:
how long,
how
wide, or how
tall.
When
students are
asked to give
3 really
different examples
of things they
can measure
and are asked
why they think
the 3 examples
are different,
students
often tend
to give
examples
of objects
all
with the same
attribute.
Here are some
examples of
students'
thinking.
- Example
1:
Pencil,
book, eraser
(They are
different.
They all
aren't the
same size.)
- Example
2: Your foot,
a desk, and
a note book
( Because one
can be bigger
and also they
are different
measure and
they are not
the same object.)
- Example
3: You can
measure how
much water
is in a cup,
how
wide something
is, or how
big a cube
is. (When you
measure water,
you use a measuring
glass, when
you measure
how wide something
is you just
measure across
the shape.)
Example
1 and
example
2 illustrate
that students
interpret “really
different
examples
of things” in
terms
of
objects,
not
in
terms
of
attributes
that
can
be
measured.
Example
3 is
illustrating
more
sophisticating
idea
that
a
student
differentiates
different
attributes
that
can
be
measured
and
different
tools
to
measure the
attributes. [Object-attribute
distinction]
.........................................................................................
When
students
are asked
how they
measure
how long
something
is/ how
heavy something
is, and
what are
some important
things
to keep
in mind, students
often think
of measurement
as a set
of procedures,
without
referencing
the conceptual
distinctions
in measure
(the
big
ideas).
So, they
might
recall
starting
at 0
and
to “use
the
marks” and
to “read
the
number.”
Here
are some
examples
of students'
response.
- Example
1: With
a ruler,
yardstick,
and rope.
To always
start
at the
0 of
a ruler
- Example
2: I
would
use a
ruler
to measure
how long
something
is. I
would
keep in
mind
what the
small
marks
mean on
the ruler.
- Example
3: I
would
measure
how heavy
something
with
a scale.
I would
keep
in mind
that
if the
scale
has a
.5 that
means
half.
- Example
4: With
a scale,
If you
aren't
using
a digital
scale
make
sure it
is on
the
zero.
Students
named a
ruler,
yardstick,
and rope
as tools
to measure
how long something
is.
And
for
tools
to
measure
how
heavy
something
is,
students
said
they
would
use
a
scale.
Students
responded
that
they
would
keep
in
mind
that
they always
started
at
the
0
of
a
ruler
or
a
scale.
This
suggests
that
students
had
some
tacit
knowledge
of
the
importance
of
the
origin
of
the
scale,
but
students
did
not
think
that
any number
could
serve
as
the
zero-point.
<Students'
ways of
thinking
about zero
point>
The
item below
was
asked
to
students
to learn
how
students
thought
about
the
zero-point.
Of
the 21
students
in a 6
th grade
classroom,
6 students
answered
correctly.
And six
students
answered
the piece
of wood
was
3 ½ inches.
It seems
that
those
students
who said
the
length
of the
piece
of wood
was 3 ½ just
read
the
numbers
on the
ruler
without
thinking
about
the
distance
covered
by the
piece
of wood.
Q:
How long
is the
piece of
wood?
Here
is another
example
that students
think measurement
as counting
rather
than as
assigning
numbers
to magnitudes. In
the video
clip,
one
student
is stretching
out his
two arms,
and the
other
student
is measuring
the length
of
the outstretched
arms from
fingertip
to fingertip with
a plastic
water
bottle.
Please
notice
that
one
student counts
“One” with
the
movement
of
the
water
bottle.
|
|
|
|
|
Last Updated:
March 31, 2005
All Rights reserved. |
 |
|