En Banc
Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data
Feb. 2, 2018—Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data Response to Jennifer Daskal, Borders and Bits, 71 Vand. L. Rev. 179 (2018). AUTHOR Paul Schiff Berman Walter S. Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School.
Commodified Promises and Contract Theory
Jan. 26, 2018—Commodified Promises and Contract Response to Erik Encarnacion, Contract as Commodified Promise, 71 Vand. L. Rev. 61 (2018). AUTHOR Brian H. Bix Frederick W. Thomas Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Minnesota.
Ambiguities and Agency Cases: Reflections After (Almost) Ten Years on the Bench
Dec. 20, 2017—Ambiguities and Agency Cases AUTHOR Honorable Raymond M. Kethledge Judge, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Neutral Principles and Political Power: A Response to Reverse Political Process Theory
Nov. 5, 2017—Neutral-Principles-and-Political-Power1 Response to Aaron Tang, Reverse Political Process Theory, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 1427 (2017). AUTHOR Matthew A. Seligman Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School.
Lost in Transplantation: The Supreme Court’s Post-Prudence Jurisprudence
Oct. 18, 2017—Lost in Transplantation The Supreme Court’s Post-Prudence Jurisprudence Response to Fred Smith, Undemocratic Restraint, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 845 (2017). AUTHOR Adam N. Steinman University Research Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of Law.
Delaware Court Refuses to Dismiss Common Stockholder’s Challenge to Redemption of Preferred Stock Owned by Controlling Stockholder
Sep. 18, 2017—Delaware-Court-Refuses-to-Dismiss-Common-Stockholders-Challenge-to-Redemption-of-Preferred-Stock-Owned-by-Controlling-Stockholder1 ABSTRACT Fiduciary standard of conduct requires board to maximize long-term value of common stock when exercising discretion in connection with contract rights of preferred stockholders AUTHOR Robert S. Reder Robert S. Reder, Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a consulting attorney at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley...
Delaware Court Enjoins Stockholder Vote Pending Corrective Disclosures
Aug. 31, 2017—Delaware Court Enjoins Stockholder Vote Pending Corrective Disclosures ABSTRACT Requires a “complete picture of the facts in one place” before allowing acquiring company stockholder meeting to proceed AUTHOR Robert S. Reder Robert S. Reder, Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a consulting attorney at Milbank, Tweed,...
Delaware Court Grants Pleading-Stage Dismissal of Litigation Challenging Control Stockholder-Led Buyout
Aug. 31, 2017—Delaware Court Grants Pleading-Stage Dismissal of Litigation Challenging Control Stockholder-Led Buyout ABSTRACT Because buyout followed “M&F Framework,” court not troubled by existence of higher third-party offer that was rejected by control stockholders AUTHOR Robert S. Reder Robert S. Reder, Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a...
Delaware Chancellor Again Invokes Corwin in Granting Directors’ Motion to Dismiss Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim
Aug. 31, 2017—Delaware-Chancellor-Again-Invokes-Corwin-In-Granting-Directors-Motion-to-Dismiss1 ABSTRACT Discusses potential application of Corwin in the context of allegedly unreasonable deal protections included in merger agreement AUTHOR Robert S. Reder Robert S. Reder, Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a consulting attorney at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP in New York City...
Delaware Court Refuses to Invoke Corwin to “Cleanse” Alleged Director Misconduct Despite Stockholder Vote Approving Merger
Aug. 31, 2017—Delaware Court Refuses to Invoke Corwin to Cleanse Alleged Director Misconduct ABSTRACT Alleged material omissions in disclosures to stockholders lead court to deny defendant directors’ motion to dismiss; also addresses meaning of “coercion” in Corwin context AUTHOR Robert S. Reder Robert S. Reder, Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has...
Institutional Effects on Reciprocal Legitimation in the Federal Courts
May. 23, 2017—Institutional Effects on Reciprocal Legitimation in the Federal Courts Response to Neil S. Siegel, Reciprocal Legitimation in the Federal Courts System, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 1183 (2017). AUTHOR Donald P. Klekamp Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law
A Mild Defense of Our New Machine Overlords
May. 23, 2017—A Mild Defense of Our New Machine Overlords Response to Kiel Brennan-Marquez, “Plausible Cause”: Explanatory Standards in the Age of Powerful Machines, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 1249 (2017). AUTHOR Visiting Fellow, Yale Information Society Project; Visiting Researcher, Georgetown University Law Center. J.D. 2011, University of Michigan.
Delaware Courts Confront Question Whether “Cleansing Effect” of Corwin Applies to Duty of Loyalty Claims
May. 9, 2017—Delaware Courts Confront Question ABSTRACT Recent rulings settle apparent divergence between Comstock and Larkin decisions and narrow exception to application of Corwin to cases where controlling stockholder extracts personal benefits in a merger transaction AUTHORS Robert S. Reder Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a consulting...
Doubling Down on “Plain Language”: Delaware Court Extends In re VAALCO Energy by Invalidating Supermajority Vote Requirement for Director Removal
May. 4, 2017—Doubling Down on Plain Language Delaware Court Extends ABSTRACT Court finds that plain language of DGCL §141(k) unequivocally requires only a simple stockholder majority to remove members of an unclassified board of directors AUTHORS Robert S. Reder Professor of the Practice of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, has been serving as a consulting attorney...
Short-Circuiting the New Major Questions Doctrine
Apr. 25, 2017—Short-Circuiting the New Major Questions Doctrine Response to Michael Coenen & Seth Davis, Minor Courts, Major Questions, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 777 (2017). ABSTRACT In Minor Courts, Major Questions, Michael Coenen and Seth Davis advance perhaps the most provocative proposal to date to address the new major questions doctrine articulated in King v. Burwell. They...
Changing Lanes: The Criminalization of Refusal in DUI Laws
Apr. 25, 2017—Changing Lanes: The Criminalization of Refusal in DUI Laws AUTHOR J.D. Candidate , May 2017, Vanderbilt University Law School; B.S., 2013, Tulane University.