Using the GBC in Bible Study Groups and Classes
The Global Bible Commentary invites its users to:
Ø
read
the Bible on their own, going from
book to book through the entire Bible.
o
The
GBC provides an excellent incentive
for individuals, groups, and classes to read and study the entire Bible.
Ø
read
the Bible with the scholars from all
over the world and from different religious persuasions. These contributors reveal (rather than hide)
the particular socio-economic, cultural, ethical, ideological, and/or religious
concerns and interests that drive their reading of the biblical text in specific
life contexts. Through this openness the
contributors invite other readers of the Bible to dialogue with them.
o
The
users of the GBC are themselves
called upon to make explicit the contextual concerns and interests that drive
their own reading of the biblical text.
The GBC offers all a series of
models for reading the Bible in terms of one’s life context and for understanding
one’s life context in terms of a biblical text.
Ø
read
the Bible with others who, like the
contributors to the GBC, propose interpretations of the Bible that
might be quite different from ours, even though they might be part of the same
group or class..
o
By
respecting other people’s different interpretations, the users of the GBC who participate in group studies a)
become aware of the contextual, theological, and textual choices they have made
in formulating their own interpretations and b) are then in a position to better
assess the choices they made and to assume responsibility for these
choices: Are their interpretive choices the
most helpful in their life context?
Most
of this can be achieved by individual users of the GBC, such as preachers preparing a sermon through which they seek
to address their congregations’ needs by taking into account their particular situations. But the GBC
is especially designed for Bible study groups and classes that look for a
constructive and critical way of reading large portions of the Bible, if not
the entire Bible, and of promoting active participation of their members.
With
seventy-two contextual commentaries or articles, the GBC provides ample resources for two semester-long classes in seminaries
or colleges (contrasting other interpretations, as suggested by the
bibliographies, with those of the GBC) or for a year-long Bible Study Group.
Ø
For
each session, one (or two) biblical book(s)
and the corresponding GBC commentary(ies) may be assigned, asking the participants to prepare themselves for the session by
o
reading
the biblical text (with or without the
help found in a study Bible such as the NISB and/or
in commentaries) to write down what, in their view, this text has to say about
their own life-context about the “relationship between the People of God and
the World” (the broad question behind the GBC
commentaries);
o
then,
reading the GBC commentary on this
text, taking note of
§
the
differences[1]
between their own contexts and that of the GBC
contributor, carefully identifying in both cases the particular contextual
issues that are of concern for the contributor and for the member of the
group/class;
§
the
differences between the ethical and
theological points they underscored and those underscored by the GBC contributor;
§
the
differences between the features of
the text they found most significant and chose to emphasize, and those chosen
by the GBC contributor;
o
During the session, following this preparation, a fruitful discussion
among the members of the group can take place, which according to the goals of
the group or class can be focused on one or another type of differences among
the members’ interpretations as compared with the one proposed in the GBC.
Ø
After
several such sessions on a series of biblical books and corresponding
contextual GBC commentaries, a group
project (or individual projects) might be to prepare a contextual commentary
for their own life-context, following the pattern found in the GBC—including, in addition, a comparison
with the GBC commentary.
Ø
A
discussion of this group (or individual) project can be devoted to its
refinement for eventual publication on the web-site of the GBC http://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/religious_studies/GBC/ where exemplary contextual
commentaries in response to those of the GBC
will be posted following critical review.
Send submission to the General Editor:
Daniel.M.Patte@Vanderbilt.edu
[1] The focus on “differences” is essential; it is only when we recognize the differences
between our interpretation and those of others that we learn from them, and thus
truly respect them—rather than co-opting them, by pretending they are the same
as ours, or rejecting them as meaningless.