*animated gif from angelfire.lycos.com, photo from VU photo library
Vanderbilt University
Department of Religious Studies, College of Arts and ScienceRLST/DIV 3830 Methods in New Testament Criticism
Schedule | Requirements | Books | Faculty | Notices | Assignments | Vumail | Acorn
celebrating diversity at vandy
Welcome to our homepage! Here's a brief description of the course. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions, or you need to make clarrifications, or you want to discuss whatever class-stuff there is to discuss. I would appreciate your suggestions on how to make our seminar more interesting and fruitful, hopefully, for everyone.
Garland 301, Box 1585 Station B, Nashville, TN 37235 : Tel (615) 322-4884 : send comments and suggestions to webmaster
RLST/DIV 3830 Methods in New Testament Criticism
Schedule | Requirements | Books | Faculty | Notices | Assignments | Vumail | Acorn
Course Description
This advanced seminar for Ph.D. Candidates in biblical studies (open to other students with permission of the instructor) will include:a) a review of a broad range of critical methods presently used in New Testament analysis--including textual, source, form, redaction, literary, sociological, anthropological, structural, political, cultural, reader-response criticisms. It is expected that the members of the seminar already know most of these methods; the goal of this review is to explore how these different methods are interrelated.
b) a parallel exploration of different paradigms which have served, serve, or might serve to integrate this plurality of methods in a practice of critical biblical studies–including historical paradigms, literary semiotic paradigms, feminist paradigms, post-colonialist paradigms, postmodern cross-disciplinary paradigms, and pedagogical/pragmatic paradigms (including Scriptural Criticism). Once again, it is expected that the members of the seminar already know several of these paradigms. The question is: what are the different ways in which they can be interrelated?
c) an on-going reflection on the ethical issues involved in the choice of a primary paradigm through an examination of the conception and practice of critical reading over time.